Note: This is an individual assignment. In 1,500-2,000 words, describe the teaching experience and discuss your observations. The written portion of this assignment should include:
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Community Teaching Plan: Teaching Experience Paper
Less than Satisfactory
|30.0 % Comprehensive Summary of Teaching Plan With Epidemiological Rationale for Topic||Summary of community teaching plan is not identified or missing.||Summary of community teaching plan is incomplete.||Summary of community teaching plan is offered but some elements are vague.||Focus of community teaching is clear with a detailed summary of each component. Rationale is not provided.||Focus of community teaching is clear, consistent with Functional Health Patterns (FHP) assessment findings and supported by explanation of epidemiological rationale.|
|50.0 % Evaluation of Teaching Experience With Discussion of Community Response to Teaching Provided. Areas of Strength and Areas of Improvement Described||Evaluation of teaching experience is omitted or incomplete.||Evaluation of teaching experience is unclear and/or discussion of community response to teaching is missing.||Evaluation of teaching experience is provided with a brief discussion of community response to teaching.||A detailed evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response to teaching and areas of strength/improvement is provided.||Comprehensive evaluation of teaching experience with discussion of community response provided along with a detailed description of barriers and strategies to overcome barriers is provided.|
|15.0 %Organization and Effectiveness|
|5.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose||Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.||Thesis is insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear.||Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.||Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.||Thesis is comprehensive; contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.|
|5.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions||Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.||Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.||Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.||A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.||There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.|
|5.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)||Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.||Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present.||Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.||Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.||Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.|
|2.0 % Paper Format||Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.||Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.||Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.||Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.||All format elements are correct.|
|3.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment)||No reference page is included. No citations are used.||Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.||Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.||Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style guide is usually correct.||In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.|
|100 % Total Weightage|
Hi there! Click one of our representatives below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.